BLUETTI AC60 vs Jackery Explorer 500 Portable Power Stations

BLUETTI AC60

Extended trips or off-grid scenarios

LiFePO4 battery for safety and longevity

Higher power output and surge capacity

View at BLUETTI

Jackery Explorer 500

Higher initial energy storage capacity

Greater portability with lighter weight and smaller dimensions

Smartphone app control for real-time monitoring

View at Jackery

Portable power stations are becoming increasingly popular, and for good reason. They offer a reliable source of power for camping trips or as an emergency backup during unexpected blackouts. However, choosing the right one can be a bit tricky.

Understanding battery capacity and the different types of battery technology, such as Lithium-ion versus LiFePO4, can be daunting. But don’t worry – we’re here to help you navigate through these complexities.

In this article, we’ll be comparing two top models: the BLUETTI AC60 and the Jackery Explorer 500. We aim to provide a detailed comparison to assist you in selecting the best option that suits your needs. So let’s dive in without further ado!

Before diving in, we recommend you check out the helpful comparison tables on the Bluetti and Jackery websites to get a feel for where these products sit in their line-up:

Battery Specs and Features

Battery Capacity (Wh): The BLUETTI AC60 and Jackery Explorer 500 differ significantly in their energy storage capacities, measured in watt-hours (Wh). The Jackery model boasts a higher capacity at 518Wh, compared to the BLUETTI’s 403Wh.

This difference indicates that the Jackery can power more devices for a longer duration than its counterpart. Therefore, if your energy needs are substantial, you might want to consider opting for the unit with greater Wh – in this case, the Jackery Explorer 500.

Battery Type: The BLUETTI AC60 utilises a LiFePO4 battery, renowned for its safety and longevity. This makes it an excellent choice for frequent or high-stakes use. Conversely, the Jackery Explorer 500 employs a standard Lithium-ion battery which typically offers greater energy density but may not last as long.

Understanding the type of battery used can give you insight into how durable and safe each unit will be in operation.

Life Cycles: The BLUETTI AC60 boasts over 3,000 charge and discharge cycles before its capacity drops to 80% of the original. In contrast, the Jackery Explorer 500 offers between 800 to more than 80%. This indicates that the BLUETTI AC60 may provide a longer lifespan and potentially greater cost-effectiveness in terms of battery replacement.

Expandable Capacity: The BLUETTI AC60 offers the ability to connect additional batteries, boosting its total storage capacity up to 2,015Wh. This feature is particularly handy when you’re out bush or on a long road trip with no access to power. In contrast, the Jackery Explorer 500 doesn’t provide this option.

Power Output

AC Output (W): The BLUETTI AC60 and Jackery Explorer 500 differ in their maximum continuous power output from the AC outlets. The former boasts a higher wattage rating of 600W, while the latter offers 500W. This difference could be significant if you’re intending to run high-powered devices such as microwaves or power tools. In this regard, the BLUETTI AC60 appears to have an edge over its counterpart.

Surge Power (W): The BLUETTI AC60, with a surge power of 1,200W, can provide a higher short burst of energy compared to the Jackery Explorer 500’s 1000W. This difference could be significant when powering devices that require high initial power like fridge compressors. Therefore, in terms of surge power capacity, the BLUETTI AC60 outperforms the Jackery Explorer 500.

Ports and Outlets

AC Outlets: The BLUETTI AC60 and Jackery Explorer 500 differ in the number of AC outlets they offer. The former provides two, while the latter only has one. This means you can power more devices at once with the BLUETTI.

Both these battery power stations supply a voltage of 230V, but there’s a slight difference in amperage. The BLUETTI outputs at 2.6A, whereas it isn’t specified for the Jackery model.

This could potentially impact compatibility with certain devices, so it’s worth checking your device specifications before choosing between these two models.

USB-A Outlets: The BLUETTI AC60 and Jackery Explorer 500 both offer USB-A ports for charging low-power devices. However, the AC60 has two outlets with a higher amperage of 3A, suggesting faster charging times.

In contrast, the Explorer 500 provides three outlets but at a lower amperage of 2.4A. This means it may charge slower than the AC60, but its extra outlet offers more versatility in terms of multiple device charging simultaneously.

USB-C Outlets: The BLUETTI AC60 and Jackery Explorer 500 differ significantly in their outlet offerings. The former provides a single outlet with a maximum output of 100W, while the latter lacks this feature entirely. This difference could impact the user’s ability to charge larger devices such as laptops.

USB-C is becoming increasingly prevalent due to its compatibility with a wide range of devices, including smartphones and laptops. However, neither model appears to offer this newer standard. A higher wattage rating would allow for faster charging times but both models seem comparable in this regard.

Lastly, having more ports allows for simultaneous charging of multiple devices. In this aspect, the BLUETTI AC60 has an advantage over the Jackery Explorer 500 due to its single

DC5521 Outlets (5.5mm): The BLUETTI AC60 features a 12V, 10A outlet, which is handy for certain electronic devices and smaller appliances. In contrast, the Jackery Explorer 500 doesn’t offer this specific feature.

Other DC Outlets: Both the BLUETTI AC60 and Jackery Explorer 500 models feature a single car outlet. This is particularly handy for charging devices that utilise car chargers or specialised plugs. If you own such gadgets, this aspect could be quite significant to consider.

Charging Options

AC Charging (W): The BLUETTI AC60 boasts a maximum power of 600W, indicating it could potentially charge faster from a wall outlet. On the other hand, the Jackery Explorer 500 doesn’t support direct AC charging and requires an external charger. The wattage is significant but should be considered in relation to each unit’s total battery capacity for a comprehensive understanding.

DC / Car Charging: Both the BLUETTI AC60 and Jackery Explorer 500 models support a 12V/24V input from a Cigarette Lighter Port. This feature indicates that both units can be charged using a car or other DC source, which is handy for road trips or situations where an AC outlet isn’t accessible. There doesn’t appear to be any significant difference between the two in this regard.

Solar Charging (W): The BLUETTI AC60 has a higher solar input capacity at 200W, compared to the Jackery Explorer 500’s 100W. This means that the BLUETTI can charge faster from solar panels, which could be vital in off-grid or emergency scenarios.

Despite this difference, both models are designed for use with solar panels and offer renewable energy solutions. However, if rapid charging is your priority, then the BLUETTI AC60 would be more suitable due to its superior wattage acceptance.

Maximum Input (W): The BLUETTI AC60, with its 600W AC, clearly outperforms the Jackery Explorer 500 in terms of power acceptance. The latter doesn’t support direct AC charging and relies on an external charger provided.

This difference could significantly impact charging times, as higher input wattage typically leads to faster charge. So, in this aspect, the BLUETTI model seems to have a distinct advantage over the Jackery one.

Convenience Features

Wireless Charging Pad: The BLUETTI AC60 has a 15W max wireless charging feature, which the Jackery Explorer 500 lacks. This allows for convenient, cordless charging of smartphones and other devices with the BLUETTI model.

Smart App Control: The BLUETTI AC60 and Jackery Explorer 500 differ significantly in their connectivity features. The former offers control via a smartphone app, facilitated by Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, while the latter lacks this feature entirely.

This difference could impact user convenience, particularly for those who value real-time monitoring of battery status and power input/output. It’s clear that in terms of tech integration, the BLUETTI AC60 has an edge over the Jackery Explorer 500.

Warranty

Warranty: The BLUETTI AC60 offers a warranty period of 6 years, while the Jackery Explorer 500 provides a warranty for 2+1 years. This suggests that the manufacturer of the BLUETTI AC60 has more confidence in their product’s longevity and reliability. However, it’s always wise to scrutinise the terms and conditions before making your final decision.

BLUETTI AC60 vs Jackery Explorer 500 Comparison Table

FeatureBLUETTI AC60Jackery Explorer 500
Battery Capacity (Wh)403Wh518Wh
Expandable CapacityYes, up to 2,015WhNo
Battery TypeLiFePO4Lithium-ion
Life Cycles3,000+800 to 80+%
AC Output (W)600W500W
Surge Power (W)1,200W1000W
AC Outlets2 × 230V/2.6A1 Outlet – 230V
USB-A Outlets2 Outlets – 5V, 3A3 Outlets – 5V, 2.4A
USB-C Outlets1 Outlet – 100W MaxNone
DC5521 Outlets (5.5mm)1 Outlet – 12V, 10ANone
Other DC Outlets1x Car Outlet1x Car Outlet
Wireless Charging Pad1x 15W MaxNone
Solar Charging (W)200W1x 100W
AC Charging (W)600W MaxDoesn’t support direct AC charging – use external AC charger provided
DC / Car ChargingSupports 12/24V (8.5A Max)12V/24V Support
Maximum Input (W)600W ACdoesn’t support direct AC charging – use external AC charger provided
Weight (kg)9.1 kg6.4 kg
Dimensions (mm)290 x 205 x 234 mm193x300x242 mm
Warranty6 years2+1 Years
Smart App ControlYesNo

Conclusion

In conclusion, the BLUETTI AC60 and Jackery Explorer 500 offer different strengths. The Jackery model may be more suited to those needing a higher initial energy storage capacity, while the BLUETTI’s ability to connect additional batteries could make it a better choice for extended trips or off-grid scenarios.

The type of battery used in each unit also differs, with the BLUETTI utilising a LiFePO4 battery known for its safety and longevity, whereas the Jackery employs a standard Lithium-ion battery offering greater energy density but potentially shorter lifespan.

In terms of power output and surge power capacity, the BLUETTI AC60 outperforms its counterpart. However, if portability is your priority due to its lighter weight and smaller dimensions, then you might lean towards the Jackery Explorer 500.

Lastly, tech-savvy users who value real-time monitoring of their device’s status may appreciate the smartphone app control offered by the BLUETTI AC60. As always though, it’s important to consider your specific needs before making a decision between these two models.

BLUETTI AC60

Extended trips or off-grid scenarios

LiFePO4 battery for safety and longevity

Higher power output and surge capacity

View at BLUETTI

Jackery Explorer 500

Higher initial energy storage capacity

Greater portability with lighter weight and smaller dimensions

Smartphone app control for real-time monitoring

View at Jackery