Portable power stations are becoming increasingly popular, and for good reason. They offer a reliable source of power for camping trips or as an emergency backup during unexpected blackouts. However, choosing the right one can be a bit tricky.
Understanding battery capacity and the different types of battery technology, such as Lithium-ion versus LiFePO4, can pose challenges to potential buyers. That’s why we’re here to help you make an informed decision.
In this article, we’ll be comparing two top models: the BLUETTI AC60 and the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro. We aim to provide a detailed comparison to assist you in selecting the best option that suits your needs. So let’s dive in without further ado.
Before diving in, we recommend you check out the helpful comparison tables on the Bluetti and EcoFlow websites to get a feel for where these products sit in their line-up:
Battery Specs and Features
Battery Capacity (Wh): The BLUETTI AC60 and EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro differ significantly in their energy storage capacities, measured in watt-hours (Wh). The former can store up to 403Wh, while the latter boasts a much higher capacity of 768Wh. This difference indicates that the EcoFlow model can power more devices for a longer duration compared to the BLUETTI unit. Therefore, if your energy requirements are substantial, you might want to consider opting for a device with greater Wh such as the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro.
Battery Type: Both the BLUETTI AC60 and EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro utilise LiFePO4 batteries. This indicates that they’re likely to have a longer lifespan and operate safely, making them ideal for regular use or important applications. The fact that neither model uses standard Lithium-ion batteries suggests they may not offer as high an energy density, but this is offset by their increased longevity and safety features.
Life Cycles: The BLUETTI AC60 and EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro both offer around 3,000 charge cycles before their capacity drops to 80%. This indicates a similar lifespan for the batteries in both models. The longevity of these products could potentially provide cost savings over time.
Expandable Capacity: The BLUETTI AC60 offers the ability to connect additional batteries, boosting its total storage capacity up to 2,015Wh. This is a standout feature that’s particularly handy when you’re off-grid for a while. In contrast, the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro doesn’t provide this option.
AC Output (W): The BLUETTI AC60 offers a maximum continuous power output of 600W from its AC outlets. On the other hand, the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro provides a higher wattage rating at 800W. If you’re intending to operate high-powered devices such as microwaves or power tools, the latter would be more suitable due to its superior wattage capacity. This difference in power output is significant and could influence your choice depending on your specific needs.
Surge Power (W): The BLUETTI AC60 and the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro differ significantly in their surge power capabilities. The former can supply a short burst of up to 1,200W, while the latter is capable of providing a higher surge power at 1,600W. This suggests that the EcoFlow model may be better suited for devices with high start-up power demands such as fridge compressors.
Ports and Outlets
AC Outlets: The BLUETTI AC60 has two 230V/2.6A outlets, while the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro offers three outlets at 230V. This difference in outlet count could be significant depending on your power needs. Always ensure that the voltage and amperage align with your devices to avoid any potential issues.
USB-A Outlets: The BLUETTI AC60 and EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro both feature USB-A ports, commonly used for charging low-power devices. However, the BLUETTI AC60 offers two outlets with a higher amperage of 3A compared to the single outlet at 2.4A on the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro.
This suggests that not only can more devices be charged simultaneously with the BLUETTI model, but they may also charge faster due to its higher current output. The difference in power output between these models could impact their efficiency and versatility in device charging scenarios.
USB-C Outlets: The BLUETTI AC60 and EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro both have a single outlet with a maximum output of 100W. However, the EcoFlow model offers variable voltage settings, which could be beneficial for charging different types of devices. Both models support USB-C, allowing them to charge larger devices like laptops as well as smartphones.
In terms of wattage rating, they’re on par; higher wattage would mean faster device charging. The number of ports is identical in both models too – one each – enabling simultaneous charging for multiple gadgets.
DC5521 Outlets (5.5mm): The BLUETTI AC60 and EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro both feature a single DC outlet, however, their specifications differ. The AC60 offers a higher amperage at 10A compared to the RIVER 2 Pro’s 3A, indicating it can supply more current.
On the other hand, the RIVER 2 Pro provides slightly higher voltage at 12.6V versus the AC60’s 12V. Yet its maximum wattage is capped at just 36W.
These differences could impact device compatibility and charging speed for certain electronics or small appliances. It’s important to check your devices’ requirements before choosing between these two models.
Other DC Outlets: Both the BLUETTI AC60 and EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro models feature a single car outlet. This is particularly useful for charging devices that require specialised plugs or car chargers. If you utilise such devices, this aspect should be taken into account when choosing between these two models.
AC Charging (W): The BLUETTI AC60 has a maximum power intake of 600W, while the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro can accept up to 870W. This difference in wattage could potentially lead to faster charging times for the EcoFlow model. However, it’s important to weigh this against each unit’s total battery capacity when making a comparison.
DC / Car Charging: The BLUETTI AC60 and EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro both support charging from a car or other DC source, making them handy for road trips or situations where an AC outlet isn’t available. The key difference lies in their power specifications. While the BLUETTI supports 12V/24V from its Cigarette Lighter Port, the EcoFlow offers more detailed specs with 12V/24V, 8A and a maximum of 100W.
Solar Charging (W): The BLUETTI AC60 and EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro models both have a decent solar input capacity, with the latter having a slightly higher maximum wattage at 220W compared to the former’s 200W. This difference could result in faster solar charging times for the EcoFlow model, which might be beneficial if you’re planning on using it off-grid or during emergencies.
Maximum Input (W): The BLUETTI AC60 has a maximum input power of 600W, while the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro can accept up to 870W. This higher wattage for the EcoFlow model typically translates into faster charging times.
Wireless Charging Pad: The BLUETTI AC60 offers a 15W max wireless charging feature, which is absent in the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro. This allows for handy device charging without the need for cables, although its importance will vary based on individual user needs.
Smart App Control: Both the BLUETTI AC60 and EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro models can be managed via a smartphone app, offering additional ease of use and access to key data such as battery status and power metrics. The connection methods for both units are identical, utilising Wi-Fi or Bluetooth capabilities.
This feature provides users with flexibility in how they interact with their device, whether at home or on the go. It’s clear that both products have been designed with modern user needs in mind.
Warranty: The BLUETTI AC60 offers a warranty period of 6 years, while the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro provides coverage for 5 years. This suggests that the manufacturer of the BLUETTI AC60 may have more confidence in their product’s durability and longevity. However, it’s always vital to scrutinise the terms and conditions within these warranties.
BLUETTI AC60 vs EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro Comparison Table
|EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro
|Battery Capacity (Wh)
|Yes, up to 2,015Wh
|3000 cycles to 80%
|AC Output (W)
|Surge Power (W)
|2 × 230V/2.6A
|3 Outlets – 230V
|2 Outlets – 5V, 3A
|1 Outlet – 5V, 2.4A, 12W Max
|1 Outlet – 100W Max
|1 Outlet – 5/9/12/15/20V 5A, 100W Max
|DC5521 Outlets (5.5mm)
|1 Outlet – 12V, 10A
|1 Outlet – 12.6V, 3A, 36W Max
|Other DC Outlets
|1x Car Outlet
|1x Car Outlet
|Wireless Charging Pad
|1x 15W Max
|Solar Charging (W)
|AC Charging (W)
|DC / Car Charging
|Supports 12/24V (8.5A Max)
|12V/24V, 8A, 100W Max
|Maximum Input (W)
|290 x 205 x 234 mm
|Smart App Control
In conclusion, the BLUETTI AC60 and EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro both offer unique features that cater to different user needs. The EcoFlow model, with its higher energy storage capacity and wattage rating, may be more suitable for those with substantial power requirements or intending to operate high-powered devices.
On the other hand, the BLUETTI unit’s ability to connect additional batteries and its higher amperage outlets could make it a better choice for off-grid scenarios or when charging multiple devices simultaneously is required.
The longevity of both models is comparable due to their use of LiFePO4 batteries and similar charge cycle counts. However, the slightly heavier weight of the BLUETTI AC60 might impact portability but could also indicate greater functionality or power storage capabilities.
Lastly, while both models can be managed via smartphone apps for ease of use, the longer warranty period offered by BLUETTI may suggest increased confidence in product durability. Ultimately, your specific needs should guide your decision between these two capable units.