Extra outlets and wireless charging capabilities for multiple devices simultaneously. Heavier weight and larger size may limit portability.
Added convenience of smartphone app control. Lower energy storage capacity and no option for additional battery connection may not suit high power demands.
Ultimately, your specific needs will dictate which model
Portable power stations are becoming increasingly popular, and for good reason. They offer a reliable source of power for camping trips or as an emergency backup during unexpected blackouts. However, choosing the right one can be a bit tricky.
Understanding battery capacity and the different types of battery technology, such as Lithium-ion and LiFePO4, is often challenging for many people. This article aims to simplify this process by comparing two top models: the BLUETTI AC200P and the BLUETTI AC180.
We’ll delve into their features in detail to help you determine which portable power station best suits your needs. Stay tuned as we break down these two impressive units without any unnecessary jargon or fluff.
Before diving in, we recommend you check out the helpful comparison table on the Bluetti website to get a feel for where these products sit in their line-up, particularly in relation to the models they have just recently released.
Battery Specs and Features
Battery Capacity (Wh): The BLUETTI AC200P and the AC180 models differ significantly in their energy storage capacity. The former boasts a substantial 2000Wh, while the latter offers a lesser 1,152Wh. This spec indicates how many devices can be powered and for how long. Therefore, if your power needs are extensive, you’d fare better with the model offering higher Wh – in this case, the AC200P.
Battery Type: Both the BLUETTI AC200P and AC180 utilise LiFePO4 batteries. This indicates that they’re likely to have a longer lifespan and enhanced safety features compared to models using standard Lithium-ion batteries. However, it’s worth noting that these units may not offer as high energy density as those with NCM batteries.
Life Cycles: The BLUETTI AC200P offers a battery life of 3,500 cycles to 80% capacity. This indicates that the battery can be charged and discharged this many times before its capacity reduces to 80% of its original state.
On the other hand, the BLUETTI AC180 boasts a cycle life of over 3,500. This suggests it may potentially outlast the AC200P in terms of longevity before needing replacement.
In essence, both models offer substantial cycle lives which could prove cost-effective over time due to less frequent need for replacements. However, there’s an implication that the AC180 might have a slight edge in durability compared to its counterpart.
Expandable Capacity: The BLUETTI AC200P offers the ability to connect additional batteries via an optional External Battery Connection Cable, enhancing its overall storage capacity. This feature is particularly handy when you’re off-grid for a longer duration. In contrast, the BLUETTI AC180 doesn’t provide this option.
AC Output (W): The BLUETTI AC200P offers a maximum continuous power output of 2,000W from its AC outlets. This is slightly higher than the BLUETTI AC180, which delivers up to 1,800W.
This difference could be significant if you’re planning on running high-powered devices such as microwaves or power tools. The extra 200W provided by the AC200P might just give it the edge in these scenarios.
Surge Power (W): The BLUETTI AC200P, with a surge power of 4,800W, is significantly more capable in handling high-power demand devices during start-up compared to the BLUETTI AC180’s 2,700W. This difference could be pivotal when powering appliances such as fridge compressors that require a substantial initial power burst. Therefore, for users with higher energy-demanding appliances or tools, the AC200P would likely be the better choice.
Ports and Outlets
AC Outlets: Both the BLUETTI AC200P and AC180 models feature two outlets, allowing for simultaneous powering of multiple devices. However, there’s a slight difference in their voltage specifications. The AC200P operates at 220V-240V while the AC180 runs at a consistent 240V/7.5A. This could impact compatibility with certain devices, so it’s worth checking your device requirements against these specs.
USB-A Outlets: Both the BLUETTI AC200P and AC180 models have four outlets with a voltage of 5V and an amperage of 3A. This indicates that they offer identical charging capabilities for devices such as smartphones or tablets. The number of ports and their power output suggest both models provide fast, versatile charging options.
USB-C Outlets: The BLUETTI AC200P and AC180 models both feature a single outlet, but differ in their maximum wattage. The AC200P has a max of 60W while the AC180 boasts a higher limit at 100W.
This difference indicates that the AC180 can charge devices more rapidly than its counterpart. Both models utilise USB-C, which is advantageous for charging larger devices such as laptops alongside smartphones.
However, neither model offers multiple ports for simultaneous device charging.
DC5521 Outlets (5.5mm): The BLUETTI AC200P model offers two 12V, 3A outlets, while the AC180 model provides a single outlet with a higher amperage of 10A. This difference in number and power capacity could impact the type and quantity of devices you can operate simultaneously.
If your gear requires more than one DC outlet or lower amperage, then the AC200P might be better suited for your needs. On the other hand, if you have fewer devices that need a stronger current, then consider opting for the AC180 model instead.
Other DC Outlets: The BLUETTI AC200P and AC180 both feature a car outlet, making them suitable for devices that utilise car chargers or specialised plugs. However, the AC200P has an additional RV outlet which could be beneficial if you have appliances designed for use in recreational vehicles.
AC Charging (W): The BLUETTI AC200P has a maximum power input of 500W, while the BLUETTI AC180 can accept up to 1,440W. This suggests that the AC180 could potentially charge faster due to its higher wattage. However, it’s important to weigh this against each unit’s total battery capacity for a complete understanding.
DC / Car Charging: Both the BLUETTI AC200P and AC180 models support 12V/24V from a Cigarette Lighter Port. This indicates that these units can be charged from a car or other DC source, which is handy for road trips or situations where an AC outlet isn’t accessible. There’s no discernible difference between the two in this regard.
Solar Charging (W): The BLUETTI AC200P has a higher maximum wattage intake at 700W, compared to the BLUETTI AC180’s 500W. This suggests that the AC200P can charge faster via solar power, which could be vital for off-grid use or emergencies.
Maximum Input (W): The BLUETTI AC200P has a power input of 1200W and can utilise both AC and solar charging concurrently. On the other hand, the BLUETTI AC180 boasts a higher wattage at 1440W but only from an AC source. This difference in power inputs could potentially affect their respective charging times, with the latter possibly offering faster charge due to its higher wattage.
Wireless Charging Pad: The BLUETTI AC200P offers double the wireless charging capacity with 2x 15W Max, compared to the AC180’s single 15W Max. This allows for simultaneous charging of two devices wirelessly on the AC200P, a feature not available on the AC180.
This difference could be significant if you often need to charge multiple devices at once. However, it may not matter much if you rarely use wireless charging or only need to charge one device at a time.
Smart App Control: The BLUETTI AC180 model offers the advantage of smartphone app control, a feature not available in the AC200P. This allows for convenient monitoring and management of battery status, input/output power and more.
In terms of connectivity to the app, the AC180 utilises both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. Unfortunately, this information is not applicable or provided for the AC200P model.
Warranty: The BLUETTI AC200P comes with a 4-year warranty, while the AC180 model offers a year longer at 5 years. This suggests that the manufacturer has slightly more faith in the longevity and reliability of the AC180. However, it’s always wise to check out all terms and conditions before making your final decision.
BLUETTI AC200P vs BLUETTI AC180 Comparison Table
|Battery Capacity (Wh)
|Yes, with optional External Battery Connection Cable
|3,500 to 80%
|AC Output (W)
|Surge Power (W)
|2 Outlets – 220V-240V
|2 × 240V/7.5A
|4 Outlets – 5V, 3A
|4 Outlets – 5V, 3A
|1 Outlet – 60W Max
|1 Outlet – 100W Max
|DC5521 Outlets (5.5mm)
|2 Outlets – 12V, 3A
|1 Outlet – 12V, 10A
|Other DC Outlets
|1x Car Outlet, 1x RV Outlet
|1x Car Outlet
|Wireless Charging Pad
|2x 15W Max
|1x 15W Max
|Solar Charging (W)
|AC Charging (W)
|DC / Car Charging
|Supports 12/24V (8.5A Max)
|Supports 12/24V (8.5A Max)
|Maximum Input (W)
|1200W, with AC and Solar Input Simultaneously
|340 x 247 x 317 mm
|Smart App Control
In summing up, the BLUETTI AC200P and AC180 models both offer impressive features, but they cater to different needs. The AC200P’s larger energy storage capacity, higher power output, and ability to connect additional batteries may make it more suitable for those with extensive power requirements or longer off-grid durations.
Its extra outlets and wireless charging capabilities could also be beneficial for users needing to power multiple devices simultaneously. However, its heavier weight and larger size might limit its portability.
On the flip side, the AC180 model’s lighter weight and compact size could make it a better choice for those prioritising portability. Its potential longevity due to a higher cycle life and 5-year warranty might appeal to those seeking durability in their investment.
The added convenience of smartphone app control is another plus point for this model. However, its lower energy storage capacity and lack of option for additional battery connection may not suit users with high power demands.
Ultimately, your specific needs will dictate which model is best suited to you.